Posted 04.03.2015 @ 3.10PM (Edited 04.03.2015 @ 3.11PM)
Really depends what you mean by "interactive"? Are you talking a detailed or maybe 3D interface, where the user can click and something animates open, video plays, some cool swirly thing happens, or similar? Or just an offline website, as you mention? Very different beasts.
And yes, Flash could be used for the former.
Posted 04.03.2015 @ 8.08AM
::@justinfox I dont think there is an easy fix besdies having saved two versions of your images eg@x2 for retina.::
I've tried this for a couple of friends' sites: http://web.wurfl.io/#wit
Am considering using it for other sites, as it is a very easy solution to implement and does seem to work well. But obviously would like to test thoroughly before doing so.
Posted 03.03.2015 @ 7.04PM
You have the same issues with this design as the previous ones. The obvious issues for me:
- Font choices and versions
- Colour scheme/balance
- Visual hierarchy
As someone commented earlier, the work you're producing at the moment is not at the level of design graduates that cannot find work unfortunately.
If you're not willing to put in the time to learn the skills that you need to learn, and just keep plugging away with the same knowledge, I'm not sure what you expect to change? It's great you're enthusiastic, but you need to direct that enthusiasm in the right direction, and for me going on what you're showing with the examples you've posted that direction should be towards design education. IF it's something you truly have a passion for and want to become good at it.
Posted 03.03.2015 @ 11.54AM
And the above is part of why I'd recommend getting some good design fundamentals education under your belt. That will help you "pull things together" even if they come in an ad hoc fashion. You will still have a design style/theme in place that then work with adding new content.
Posted 19.12.2014 @ 1.07AM
@PSCYSM and @DAVE :
Gas has been attempted before in the Moscow theater hostage crisis (2002). It killed 130~ hostages.